On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 07:25:23PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > > How about adding
> > > if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
> > > printk(KERN_ERR "IO error or racy use of wait_on_buffer()");
> > > show_task(current);
> > > }
> > > in the end of wait_on_buffer() for a while?
> >
> > At the _top_ of wait_on_buffer would be better then at the end.
>
> In that case ll_rw_block() + wait_on_buffer() (absolutely legitimate
> combination) will scream at you.
--- 2.4.4pre7/include/linux/locks.h Thu Apr 26 05:22:11 2001
+++ 2.4.4pre7aa1/include/linux/locks.h Fri Apr 27 01:52:31 2001
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
{
if (test_bit(BH_Lock, &bh->b_state))
__wait_on_buffer(bh);
+ else if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
+ __label__ here;
+ here:
+ printk(KERN_ERR "IO error or racy use of wait_on_buffer() from %p\n", &&here);
+ }
}
extern inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:17 EST