Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?

• Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: rwsem benchmark [was Re: [PATCH] rw_semaphores, optimisations try #3]"
• Previous message: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH] rw_semaphores, optimisations try #3"
• In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:

>
> viro@math.psu.edu said:
> > Oh, for crying out loud. All it takes is half an hour per filesystem.
>
> Half an hour? If it takes more than about 5 minutes for JFFS2 I'd be very
> surprised.

<tone polite> What's stopping you? </tone>
You _are_ JFFS maintainer, aren't you?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: rwsem benchmark [was Re: [PATCH] rw_semaphores, optimisations try #3]"
• Previous message: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH] rw_semaphores, optimisations try #3"
• In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Reply: Christoph Rohland: "Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:10 EST