> > But if you are suppressing preemption in all read-side critical
sections,
> > then wouldn't any already-preempted tasks be guaranteed to -not- be in
> > a read-side critical section, and therefore be guaranteed to be
unaffected
> > by the update (in other words, wouldn't such tasks not need to be
waited
> > for)?
>
> Ah, if you want to inc and dec all the time, yes. But even if the
> performance isn't hurt, it's unneccessary, and something else people
> have to remember to do.
I must admit that free is a very good price.
> Simplicity is very nice. And in the case of module unload, gives us
> the ability to avoid the distinction between "am I calling into a
> module?" and "is this fixed in the kernel?" at runtime. A very good
> thing 8)
Is it also desireable to avoid the distinction between "the currently
executing code is in a module" and "the currently executing code is
fixed in the kernel"?
> Rusty.
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:42 EST