Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a better attribution system

• Next message: Niels Kristian Bech Jensen: "Is the empty initializers bug fixed in gcc-3.0?"
• Previous message: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• In reply to: Horst von Brand: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Horst von Brand wrote:
>
> "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@dplanet.ch> said:
>
> [...]
>
> > It whould nice also if we include the type of the license (GPL,...).
>
> If it's in-kernel, it is GPLed.

No if it is build into the kernel is GPL or GPL compatible.
some PPP drivers can be built only as modules because of
the linking restriction of GPL code to non GPL compatible
code.
In kernel there are also some automatic generated file.
GPL requires sources!

But this is off-topic for the main lkml.

        giacomo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Niels Kristian Bech Jensen: "Is the empty initializers bug fixed in gcc-3.0?"
• Previous message: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• In reply to: Horst von Brand: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:42 EST