Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Apr 20 2001 - 00:17:42 EST

Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Previous message: Russell Cattelan: "Re: kernel merge issues"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:

> This sucks for users of that architecture. Also, though not
> applicable to PA-RISC, it sucks for sub-architecture porters.
> (by sub-architecture I mean: Mac, PReP, PowerCore, BeBox, etc.)

As you said it so eloquently a few paragraphs down:

"send patches!"

cheers,

Rik

-- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk)"
Previous message: Russell Cattelan: "Re: kernel merge issues"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [parisc-linux] Re: OK, let's try cleaning up another nit. Is anyone paying attention?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:34 EST