Re: Your response is requested

From: Matti Aarnio (matti.aarnio@zmailer.org)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 01:27:29 EST


On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:03:41AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> matti.aarnio@zmailer.org said:
> > Actually not. Either your MTA, or your MUA did that.
> > I got:
> > From: J. I.
> > This particular detail -- when to add canonical domain to e.g. From:
> > address, and when not -- is implemented rather fuzzily usually..
>
> I'm in the "if it arrives unqualified by SMTP from !localhost, reject it"
> camp. I certainly can't think of a single case where it's appropriate to
> accept it _and_ qualify it with the local domain in that case.

        I didn't look for what it was at the SMTP level while
        incoming, but RFC 821 (SMTP) is the transport method, and
        VGER won't accept unqualified ( + a few more rules )

        What you are saying is that RFC 822 level (visible headers)
        should be controlled for something ?

        I have a surprise for you, RFC 822 data carries only incidental
        resemblance with the message content and destination.

        Like now, you (dwmw2) get this message twice: once from me
        which means the "From:" might even carry some resemblance
        to the sender (yes, resemblance, it isn't my login-id, just
        my email address), the second one comes via the list, and
        the Majordomo won't change the From: to be
                linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
        which is the real sender in that case...

        ... and this is completely off topic ...
> --
> dwmw2

/Matti Aarnio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST