On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Steven Cole wrote:
> Excuse me, but this seems to be something of a red herring.
> ...
> Adding seconds or tens of seconds at this time on 2001 hardware will
> seem very moot by the time 2.5/2.6 is at the point 2.4.x is now.
Adding tens of seconds per build is not acceptable when you're building
a lot of kernels each day.
The beginning of this thread showed a 15 second stall on an Athlon 800,
vs a 1 second startup for the old system. The point now is that
Eric _is_ working on improving the performance. (Which was probably
in another post you missed).
> If you haven't seen my posts here before, I just joined this list last night.
Find a list archive, read the beginning of the thread.
regards,
Dave.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST