Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux

From: Albert D. Cahalan (acahalan@cs.uml.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 28 2001 - 02:03:41 EST

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Reserved memory for highmem bouncing"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alexander Viro writes:

> * CLONE_NEWNS is made root-only (CAP_SYS_ADMIN, actually)

Would an unprivileged version that killed setuid be OK to have?

Evil idea of the day: non-directory (even non-existant) mount points and
non-directory mounts. So then "mount --bind /etc/foo /dev/bar" works.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Previous message: Marcelo Tosatti: "Reserved memory for highmem bouncing"
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 28 2001 - 21:00:15 EST