Re: Posible bug in gcc

From: Ville Herva (vherva@mail.niksula.cs.hut.fi)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 14:50:15 EST


On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:02:45PM -0500, you [Richard B. Johnson] claimed:
>
> Script started on Mon Feb 26 12:54:20 2001
> # gcc -o xxx bug.c
> # ./xxx
> Correct output: 5 2
> GCC output: 5 2
> # gcc --version
> egcs-2.91.66
> # gcc -O2 -o xxx bug.c
> # ./xxx
> Correct output: 5 2
> GCC output: 10 5
> # exit
> exit

Funny:

vherva@babbage:/tmp>/usr/bin/gcc c.c -o c; ./c ; /usr/bin/gcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 5 2
2.96
vherva@babbage:/tmp>/usr/bin/gcc -O2 c.c -o c; ./c ; /usr/bin/gcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 10 5
2.96
vherva@babbage:/tmp>/usr/bin/gcc -O6 c.c -o c; ./c ; /usr/bin/gcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 10 5
2.96
vherva@babbage:/tmp>rpm -q gcc
gcc-2.96-74

vherva@babbage:/tmp>kgcc c.c -o c; ./c ; kgcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 5 2
egcs-2.91.66
vherva@babbage:/tmp>kgcc c.c -O2 -o c; ./c ; kgcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 10 5
egcs-2.91.66
vherva@babbage:/tmp>kgcc c.c -O6 -o c; ./c ; kgcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 10 5
egcs-2.91.66
vherva@babbage:/tmp>rpm -q kgcc
kgcc-1.1.2-40

vherva@babbage:/tmp>/usr/local/bin/gcc c.c -o c; ./c ;/usr/local/bin/gcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 5 2
pgcc-2.95.1
vherva@babbage:/tmp>/usr/local/bin/gcc c.c -O2 -o c; ./c ;/usr/local/bin/gcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 5 2
pgcc-2.95.1
vherva@babbage:/tmp>/usr/local/bin/gcc c.c -O6 -o c; ./c ;/usr/local/bin/gcc --version
Correct output: 5 2
GCC output: 5 2
pgcc-2.95.1

I guess pgcc is not that buggy EVERY time. (Sorry for the off topic post, I
couldn't resist.)

-- v --

v@iki.fi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 28 2001 - 21:00:14 EST