Re: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 20:32:27 EST

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: partition table: chs question"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.2-ac3: loop threads in D state"
In reply to: Rico Tudor: "64GB option broken in 2.4.2"
Next in thread: Rico Tudor: "Re: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2"
Reply: Rico Tudor: "Re: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Hypothesis:
> Code to handle PAE has buggy spinlock management.

Hypthesis#2 The bounce buffer code in the Linus tree is known to be
imperfect. Does 2.4.2ac3 do the same ?

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: partition table: chs question"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: 2.4.2-ac3: loop threads in D state"
In reply to: Rico Tudor: "64GB option broken in 2.4.2"
Next in thread: Rico Tudor: "Re: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2"
Reply: Rico Tudor: "Re: 64GB option broken in 2.4.2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 28 2001 - 21:00:10 EST