Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c, kernel 2.4.1

From: Augustin Vidovic (
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 02:37:34 EST

On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:23:01PM -0800, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> Intel's documentation states that the bug does NOT exist if the
> bits 0 and 1 in eeprom[3] are 1. Thus, the workaround is correct,
> the printk is wrong.

I wonder if it's not Intel's documentation which is wrong : it seems
that the bug showed up also with the network cards used in my boxes,
and the patch I proposed seemed to fix that problem.

Augustin Vidovic         
"Nous sommes tous quelque chose de naissance, musicien ou assassin,
 mais il faut apprendre le maniement de la harpe ou du couteau."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 21:00:11 EST