Re: [patch?] RAMFS

From: David Woodhouse (
Date: Sun Feb 04 2001 - 08:48:33 EST

On 4 Feb 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote:

> Yes and no. tmpfs has a little bit overhead for the noswap case but
> this overhead is in the kernel anyways for shared anon mappings. The
> whole vm is using swap unconditionally.

I'm hoping that'll end up conditional on CONFIG_BLK_DEV or CONFIG_SWAP.


- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:00:19 EST