Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink

From: Albert D. Cahalan (
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 18:49:49 EST

Alan Cox writes:
> [Albert Cahalan]
>> David Woodhouse writes:

>>> -a "$CC" = "gcc"
>> Not worth it; they should upgrade the local gcc too.
>> If anything, they are getting a reminder that they need.
> The local gcc has no bearing on the compiler. The local
> compiler might not even be gcc - eg if they are cross
> building off non Linux systems

I know, and it still doesn't matter. So we test Solaris cc.
If it happens to have the same bug as gcc 2.96, then it is
broken and ought to be replaced.

I wouldn't want "menuconfig" messed up by a broken compiler,
even if I'm cross-compiling from HP-UX to sh4 Linux.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 07 2001 - 21:00:18 EST