Linux-Kernel Archive
By Thread

Starting: Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:08:04 EST
Ending: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 20:54:34 EST

• Re: Bug in ppp_async.c Paul Mackerras (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:04:49 EST)
  • Re: Bug in ppp_async.c Albert D. Cahalan (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:01:24 EST)
    • Re: Bug in ppp_async.c David Woodhouse (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:42:51 EST)
    • Re: Bug in ppp_async.c Paul Mackerras (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:45:33 EST)
      • Re: Bug in ppp_async.c Dan Egli (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:03:04 EST)
      • Re: Bug in ppp_async.c Albert D. Cahalan (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 00:17:49 EST)
• Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:12:46 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... Barry K. Nathan (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:34:24 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... Benson Chow (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:54:15 EST)
    • Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... Miles Lane (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:13:38 EST)
• A little patch for i386/kernel/microcode.c Jo l'Indien (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:28:35 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Brent Rowland (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:42:15 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:50:27 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style Kai Henningsen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:38:00 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style Kai Henningsen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:33:00 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style Kai Henningsen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:25:00 EST)
    • Re: [OT?] Coding Style Harald Arnesen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:30:18 EST)
    • Re: [OT?] Coding Style James Stevenson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:20:15 EST)
• Re: [NFS] Linux 2.2.18 nfs v3 server bug (was: Incompatible: FreeBSD 4.2 client, Linux 2.2.18 nfsv3 server, read-only export) Neil Brown (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 01:06:55 EST)
  • Re: [NFS] Linux 2.2.18 nfs v3 server bug (was: Incompatible: FreeBSD 4.2 client, Linux 2.2.18 nfsv3 server, read-only export) Matthias Andree (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:20:02 EST)
    • Re: [NFS] Linux 2.2.18 nfs v3 server bug (was: Incompatible: FreeBSD 4.2 client, Linux 2.2.18 nfsv3 server, read-only export) Matthias Andree (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:29:18 EST)
  • Re: [NFS] Linux 2.2.18 nfs v3 server bug (was: Incompatible: FreeBSD 4.2 client, Linux 2.2.18 nfsv3 server, read-only export) Neil Brown (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 20:53:42 EST)
• 2001-01-23 release of hotplug scripts Greg KH (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 01:12:13 EST)
  • Re: 2001-01-23 release of hotplug scripts David Brownell (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:31:07 EST)
• [PATCH] fixes for 2.4.1 Rusty Russell (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 01:17:56 EST)
• Re: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Tim Sullivan (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 01:43:29 EST)
  • Re: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller I Lee Hetherington (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:43:39 EST)
    • Re: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Matt Domsch (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:30:39 EST)
  • Re: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Martin Josefsson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:57:13 EST)
  • Re: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Tim Sullivan (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:20:01 EST)
  • Re: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Tom Sightler (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:07:50 EST)
    • Re: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Matt Domsch (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:27:08 EST)
• Question: Memory change request Leslie Donaldson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 01:44:58 EST)
  • Re: Question: Memory change request Chris Wedgwood (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:05:00 EST)
    • RE: Question: Memory change request David Schwartz (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:47:53 EST)
      • Re: Question: Memory change request Chris Wedgwood (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:03:33 EST)
  • Re: Question: Memory change request Jamie Lokier (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:48:23 EST)
• Re: sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space Andreas Jaeger (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:02:23 EST)
• Re: stripping symbols from modules H. Peter Anvin (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:42:54 EST)
  • Re: stripping symbols from modules Paul Gortmaker (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:36:46 EST)
  • Re: stripping symbols from modules Willy Tarreau (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 12:54:33 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Julian Anastasov (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:21:02 EST)
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Bernd Eckenfels (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:32:13 EST)
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Julian Anastasov (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:19:30 EST)
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Bernd Eckenfels (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:08:20 EST)
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Pete Elton (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:30:49 EST)
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Julian Anastasov (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:02:32 EST)
    • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Bernd Eckenfels (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:08:58 EST)
      • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Julian Anastasov (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:13:42 EST)
• Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Richard Henderson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 02:51:15 EST)
  • Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:02:40 EST)
    • Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Richard Henderson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:51:49 EST)
      • Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:21:44 EST)
      • Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Richard Henderson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:49:05 EST)
    • Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Thomas Pornin (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:09:37 EST)
  • Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Jesse Pollard (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:46:20 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andreas Dilger (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:18:59 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:28:28 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:40:38 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Petr Matula (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:43:45 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 03:44:23 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:12:49 EST)
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:29:25 EST)
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Alan Cox (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:11:07 EST)
      • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:06:33 EST)
      • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? bert hubert (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:42:01 EST)
      • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:14:48 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:20:33 EST)
    • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:58:03 EST)
      • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:10:15 EST)
      • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:46:38 EST)
      • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:12:51 EST)
• Re: A little patch for i386/kernel/microcode.c (fwd) Tigran Aivazian (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:10:10 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] No VIA IDE DMA unless configured Vojtech Pavlik (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:24:18 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] No VIA IDE DMA unless configured Stephen Clark (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:14:59 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] No VIA IDE DMA unless configured Andre Hedrick (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 15:50:55 EST)
• Re: display problem with matroxfb f5ibh (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:32:33 EST)
  • Re: display problem with matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:46:51 EST)
  • Re: display problem with matroxfb f5ibh (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:17:45 EST)
    • Re: display problem with matroxfb Rafael E. Herrera (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:59:37 EST)
    • [PATCH] Re: display problem with matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:17:33 EST)
  • Re: display problem with matroxfb Trevor Hemsley (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:14:25 EST)
  • Re: display problem with matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 19:28:48 EST)
  • Re: display problem with matroxfb Trevor Hemsley (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 00:57:48 EST)
• [PATCH] Compile dnotify example w/o glibc 2.2 headers Daniel Phillips (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:27:54 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile dnotify example w/o glibc 2.2 headers Andreas Jaeger (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:12:57 EST)
• inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? V Ganesh (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:55:16 EST)
  • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Marcelo Tosatti (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:09:53 EST)
  • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Stephen C. Tweedie (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 06:26:24 EST)
  • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? V Ganesh (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:47:30 EST)
    • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:44:32 EST)
      • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:05:54 EST)
      • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Marcelo Tosatti (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:30:20 EST)
      • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Stephen C. Tweedie (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:35:07 EST)
      • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Daniel Phillips (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:05:49 EST)
      • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Marcelo Tosatti (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:11:01 EST)
      • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? Stephen C. Tweedie (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:34:17 EST)
  • Re: inode->i_dirty_buffers redundant ? V Ganesh (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:13:37 EST)
• Re: Completely offtopic : [OT?] Coding Style Bernd Petrovitsch (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 04:58:16 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 statd trouble Juri Haberland (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:01:30 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 statd trouble Luc de Louw (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:55:13 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.0 statd trouble Juri Haberland (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:11:09 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 statd trouble nbecker@fred.net (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:09:51 EST)
• Re: limit on number of kmapped pages David Wragg (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:09:22 EST)
  • Re: limit on number of kmapped pages Eric W. Biederman (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:27:05 EST)
  • Random thoughts on sustained write performance Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:06:00 EST)
  • Re: limit on number of kmapped pages Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:16:21 EST)
  • Re: limit on number of kmapped pages David Wragg (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:53:16 EST)
• Coding Style -- test of tabooed headers.. Matti Aarnio (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:13:10 EST)
• Another Majordomo Test Matti Aarnio (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:31:42 EST)
• What that Majordomo testing was about ... Matti Aarnio (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 05:50:31 EST)
• Linux 2.4.0ac11 Alan Cox (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 06:33:06 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Cataldo Thomas (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:05:13 EST)
    • NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Anton Altaparmakov (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:54:36 EST)
      • Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:03:30 EST)
      • Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 mirabilos (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:09:49 EST)
      • Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Anton Altaparmakov (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:23:49 EST)
      • Re: NTFS safety and lack thereof - Was: Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:38:16 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Luc de Louw (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:06:47 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Alan Cox (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:36:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Sergey Kubushin (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:39:27 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:18:17 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Matthias Andree (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:02:16 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Sergey Kubushin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:50:26 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Anton Altaparmakov (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 21:04:06 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.0ac11 Sergey Kubushin (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 21:13:54 EST)
• Re: monitoring I/O Daniel Kobras (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 06:57:45 EST)
  • Re: monitoring I/O richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:58:26 EST)
• vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Arkadiusz Miskiewicz (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:14:31 EST)
  • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Brad Felmey (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:23:03 EST)
    • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Arkadiusz Miskiewicz (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:35:25 EST)
      • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:56:35 EST)
      • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Gábor Lénár (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:28:25 EST)
    • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Eric Lammerts (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:50:07 EST)
  • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Albert D. Cahalan (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:53:51 EST)
    • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:41:37 EST)
      • Re: vfat <-> vfat copying of ~700MB file, so slow! Ion Badulescu (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 00:52:01 EST)
• Re: Firewall netlink question... Harald Welte (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:27:53 EST)
  • Re: Firewall netlink question... Harald Welte (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:30:42 EST)
    • Re: Firewall netlink question... Scaramanga (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:26:23 EST)
• Re: more on scheduler benchmarks Daniel Phillips (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:29:14 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Harald Welte (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:37:40 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Harald Welte (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:38:56 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Harald Welte (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:41:42 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre7 SMP oops Paul Flinders (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:49:16 EST)
• Why only Linux uses GCC to compile the source code. please help Mahadev K Cholachagudda (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:19:13 EST)
  • Re: Why only Linux uses GCC to compile the source code. please help Erik Mouw (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:19:48 EST)
• Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Daniel Phillips (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:58:22 EST)
  • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Gregory Maxwell (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:29:30 EST)
    • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Daniel Phillips (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:32:07 EST)
      • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Andrew Morton (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:45:48 EST)
      • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Alan Cox (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:18:36 EST)
    • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Tim Fletcher (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:05:43 EST)
  • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Shawn Starr (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:50:05 EST)
  • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Tim Fletcher (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:05:02 EST)
    • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Russell King (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:49:10 EST)
• Re: Big Bada Boom... Peter Rival (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:23:13 EST)
  • Re: Big Bada Boom... Ivan Kokshaysky (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:21:04 EST)
    • Re: Big Bada Boom... Greg from Systems (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:02:07 EST)
    • Re: Big Bada Boom... Greg from Systems (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:12:46 EST)
    • Las message I promise... Greg from Systems (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 23:34:51 EST)
      • Re: Las message I promise... Ivan Kokshaysky (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:07:00 EST)
  • Bummer... Greg from Systems (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 18:15:09 EST)
  • Grr.. Greg from Systems (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 19:07:15 EST)
• Re: [2.2.18] outgoing connections getting stuck in SYN_SENT Mark Longair (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:01:14 EST)
  • Re: [2.2.18] outgoing connections getting stuck in SYN_SENT Martin Josefsson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:07:57 EST)
  • Re: [2.2.18] outgoing connections getting stuck in SYN_SENT Eric Lammerts (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:39:06 EST)
• ACPI trouble with MS-6167 motherboard dmeyer@dmeyer.net (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:06:45 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Paul Gortmaker (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:32:35 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Keith Owens (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:57:51 EST)
• [PATCH]: hgafb crash on MDA only cards Paul Gortmaker (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:51:15 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH]: hgafb crash on MDA only cards Bakonyi Ferenc (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:42:28 EST)
• Re: changing mac address of eth alias David Weis (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:14:37 EST)
  • Re: changing mac address of eth alias Ben Greear (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:20:21 EST)
• Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? Sasi Peter (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:05:12 EST)
• S_DEAD David Woodhouse (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:01:19 EST)
• Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:14:02 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? David Wragg (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:39:10 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:16:55 EST)
    • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:56:32 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Roman Zippel (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:44:51 EST)
    • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:49:50 EST)
      • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Jeff Hartmann (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:04:47 EST)
      • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:11:04 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Jeff Hartmann (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:47:13 EST)
    • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:53:01 EST)
      • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Jeff Hartmann (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:13:35 EST)
      • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:18:43 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Jeff Hartmann (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:46:23 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Stephen C. Tweedie (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:37:14 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Stephen C. Tweedie (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:39:31 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Stephen C. Tweedie (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:43:46 EST)
• Hercules Graphics Card mirabilos (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:22:57 EST)
  • Re: Hercules Graphics Card Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:51:50 EST)
• nividia fb 0.9.0? Robert Holmberg (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:45:58 EST)
  • Re: nividia fb 0.9.0? Jeff Garzik (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:44:43 EST)
    • Re: nividia fb 0.9.0? Robert Holmberg (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:33:37 EST)
    • Re: nividia fb 0.9.0? Harold Oga (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:19:00 EST)
• RE: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller John Jasen (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:37:18 EST)
  • RE: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Matthew Jacob (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:13:16 EST)
  • RE: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller Nathan Black (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:13:26 EST)
• 2.4 destroys filesystems with VIA IDE driver.. Orlando Andico (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 10:54:02 EST)
• Driver migration question Georg Nikodym (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:06:27 EST)
  • Re: Driver migration question Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:59:12 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Steven Cole (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:08:57 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Jens Axboe (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:44:39 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Steven Cole (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:03:41 EST)
• AMD Ethernet/Am79C973/Am79C975 (pcnet32/FAST), SEEPROM R/W patch Richard B. Johnson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:34:40 EST)
• fyi megaraid problems Heitzso (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 11:50:54 EST)
  • RE: fyi megaraid problems Margulies, Adam (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:51:19 EST)
• RAID1 resync oops on 2.4.0.ac11 (was ac10) Mike Black (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:08:56 EST)
• 2.4 IDE slowdown (misconfigure) LA Walsh (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:06:22 EST)
• Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Steve Underwood (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:14:19 EST)
  • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Mark Smith (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:30:01 EST)
    • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Steven Ellmore (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:40:14 EST)
      • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Mark Smith (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:38:54 EST)
      • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... alex@foogod.com (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:51:40 EST)
      • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... mirabilos (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:04:55 EST)
    • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Alan Cox (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:26:40 EST)
      • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Steve Underwood (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 21:22:45 EST)
      • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Alan Cox (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:04:33 EST)
    • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:36:41 EST)
      • [OT] Vaio Brightness [WAS: Probably Off-topic Question...] Drew Bertola (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:38:26 EST)
  • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:26:44 EST)
  • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Thunder from the hill (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 18:17:47 EST)
• make mrproper John Levon (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:19:55 EST)
  • Re: make mrproper Joseph Pingenot (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:27:38 EST)
    • Re: make mrproper leo.howell@ntlworld.com (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:33:02 EST)
      • Re: make mrproper James Lewis Nance (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:00:26 EST)
      • Re: make mrproper Matti Aarnio (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:21:45 EST)
      • Re: make mrproper David Relson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:54:11 EST)
      • [OFFTOPIC] Re: make mrproper Ville Herva (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:02:40 EST)
      • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: make mrproper Petr Baudis (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:10:20 EST)
      • Re: make mrproper Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:33:09 EST)
    • Re: make mrproper Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:33:59 EST)
• MrProper mirabilos (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:39:15 EST)
• Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 12:48:19 EST)
  • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Jeff Hartmann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:45:43 EST)
    • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:50:38 EST)
      • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Jeff Hartmann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:30:50 EST)
    • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:30:10 EST)
      • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Jeff Hartmann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:41:41 EST)
      • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:48:05 EST)
      • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Jeff Hartmann (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:15:32 EST)
      • Re: Page Attribute Table (PAT) support? Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:31:37 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:04:50 EST)
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:25:27 EST)
    • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:58:09 EST)
      • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:20:54 EST)
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support David D.W. Downey (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:54:36 EST)
    • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:56:57 EST)
    • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:00:15 EST)
      • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support David D.W. Downey (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:26:33 EST)
• Re: [NFS] [CFT] Improved RPC congestion handling for 2.4.0 (and 2.2.18) H . J . Lu (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:19:52 EST)
• 2.4.1pre10 sr.c compile warning Heitzso (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:18:57 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre10 sr.c compile warning Jens Axboe (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:27:49 EST)
• PROBLEM: 2.2.19pre7 opps on low mem machine Peter 'Luna' Runestig (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 13:29:31 EST)
• Error compiling for sparc64 Leif Sawyer (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:08:58 EST)
  • Re: Error compiling for sparc64 David S. Miller (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:34:22 EST)
  • RE: Error compiling for sparc64 Leif Sawyer (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:11:11 EST)
• CPU error codes James Simmons (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:30:48 EST)
  • Re: CPU error codes Alan Cox (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:34:29 EST)
    • Re: CPU error codes James Sutherland (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:14:22 EST)
      • Re: CPU error codes H. Peter Anvin (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 16:29:09 EST)
      • Re: CPU error codes Alan Cox (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:23:16 EST)
      • Re: CPU error codes James Sutherland (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 16:24:51 EST)
      • Re: CPU error codes Dan Hollis (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 16:33:30 EST)
• Largefile support in 2.4 Mike Black (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:38:00 EST)
  • Re: Largefile support in 2.4 Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:03:11 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre10 configure/compile problem ebi4 (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:45:30 EST)
• Re: make *config errors mirabilos (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:52:18 EST)
• Re: Network hang with 2.4.1-pre9 and 3c59x Maciej W. Rozycki (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:35:03 EST)
  • Re: Network hang with 2.4.1-pre9 and 3c59x Andrew Morton (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:24:49 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Boris Dragovic (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:31:25 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Bernd Eckenfels (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:56:13 EST)
• Silly Question Isabelle, Francois (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 15:44:30 EST)
  • Re: Silly Question Richard B. Johnson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:09:14 EST)
• Re: ipppd == pppd? Kai Germaschewski (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:06:47 EST)
• 2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN? Chris Evans (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:09:09 EST)
• [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:23:13 EST)
  • RE: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Jonathan Earle (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:34:51 EST)
    • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:45:57 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Rogerio Brito (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 17:42:42 EST)
  • RE: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Jonathan Earle (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:52:19 EST)
    • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Peter Samuelson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:33:12 EST)
  • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Andrew Morton (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:40:37 EST)
    • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:29:08 EST)
    • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:29:14 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Ion Badulescu (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:28:19 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:36:03 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:43:49 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Ion Badulescu (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:11:40 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:14:25 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Steve Whitehouse (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:29:44 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:38:44 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Alan Cox (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:04:21 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Ion Badulescu (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:06:33 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:13:25 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Ion Badulescu (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 15:43:02 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Ion Badulescu (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:55:05 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 13:39:44 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Ion Badulescu (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 16:18:41 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 01:02:52 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:43:05 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 David S. Miller (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 17:02:39 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy patches, against 2.4.1-pre10 Andrew Morton (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:27:12 EST)
• question about compiling the kernel Jie Zhou (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:27:54 EST)
  • Re: question about compiling the kernel William Stearns (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:36:10 EST)
  • Re: question about compiling the kernel Brian Gerst (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:40:06 EST)
  • Re: question about compiling the kernel Brian Gerst (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:59:44 EST)
• oops with ac97 sound card Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:34:34 EST)
• [ANNOUNCE]: PAGG & Job module for Linux 2.4.0 Sam Watters (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:39:21 EST)
• âÅÓÐÌÁÔÎÁÑ ÒÁÚÄÁÞÁ ÐÌÁÓÔÉËÏ×ÙÈ ËÁÒÔ "VISA Vladimir (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:25:47 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 hangs with PIII i815e system Jure Pecar (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:58:28 EST)
• eepro100 problems with embedded Intel PRO/100 VM NIC Tom (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:59:05 EST)
• RE: ACPI trouble with MS-6167 motherboard (fwd) Grover, Andrew (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 16:54:48 EST)
  • Re: ACPI trouble with MS-6167 motherboard (fwd) dmeyer@dmeyer.net (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:10:42 EST)
• [ANNOUNCE]: CSA job accounting for Linux 2.4.0 Marlys Kohnke (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:04:52 EST)
• 2.2.19pre6aa1 USB - Why do I get these? Sasi Peter (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:20:21 EST)
  • RE: 2.2.19pre6aa1 USB - Why do I get these? Dunlap, Randy (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:32:53 EST)
• when is overriding idebus safe? dmeyer@dmeyer.net (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:20:38 EST)
  • Re: when is overriding idebus safe? mirabilos (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:32:19 EST)
    • Re: when is overriding idebus safe? Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:43:40 EST)
  • Re: when is overriding idebus safe? Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:42:57 EST)
    • Re: when is overriding idebus safe? Stefan Ring (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:16:31 EST)
• problem compiling 2.4.1-pre10 on ppc cpg@aladdin.de (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:20:45 EST)
• another problem pre10 & ppc cpg@aladdin.de (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:25:32 EST)
• ext2 corruption in 2.4.0 (again) Charles-Edouard Ruault (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:40:09 EST)
• final problem pre10 & ppc cpg@aladdin.de (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:42:52 EST)
  • Re: final problem pre10 & ppc Tom Rini (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:22:35 EST)
• Problem with 2.4.0 and Nautilus dobro.cnt (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:11:49 EST)
• Weird hidden /dev/audio on devfs Pavel Roskin (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:19:03 EST)
• PPP/Modem connection problems starting somewhere between 2.2.14(maybe 15) and 2.2.18 Matthew Fredrickson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:30:38 EST)
  • Re: PPP/Modem connection problems starting somewhere between 2.2.14(maybe 15) and 2.2.18 Adrian Bridgett (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 14:48:29 EST)
    • Re: PPP/Modem connection problems starting somewhere between 2.2.14(maybe 15) and 2.2.18 Matthew Fredrickson (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 18:32:41 EST)
    • Re: Kernel PPP/Modem connection problems starting somewhere between 2.2.14(maybe 15) and 2.2.18 Matthew Fredrickson (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 20:46:36 EST)
• es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard David Bustos (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:44:57 EST)
  • Re: es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard David Bustos (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:07:30 EST)
    • Re: es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard Jeff Garzik (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 09:22:45 EST)
      • Re: es1371 freezes 2.4.0 hard David Bustos (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 16:32:41 EST)
• warning in 2.4.1pre10 J . A . Magallon (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:44:54 EST)
  • Re: warning in 2.4.1pre10 Peter Samuelson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:45:00 EST)
    • Re: warning in 2.4.1pre10 J . A . Magallon (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:58:53 EST)
      • Re: warning in 2.4.1pre10 Peter Samuelson (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:33:17 EST)
• agpgart (2.4.0 kernel) Robert Dale (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:47:26 EST)
  • Re: agpgart (2.4.0 kernel) Mogens Kjaer (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 03:35:28 EST)
• RE: Probably Off-topic Question... Grover, Andrew (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:49:39 EST)
• pcmcia modules install path J . A . Magallon (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:59:07 EST)
  • Re: pcmcia modules install path Keith Owens (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:43:57 EST)
• 2.4.0-pre10 Hard lockup writing to fs on loop devices First Name Last Name (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:02:04 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre10 Hard lockup writing to fs on loop devices Jens Axboe (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:13:40 EST)
• SpeedStep,MHz,BogoMIPS,timing.. Robert Dale (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:13:00 EST)
  • Re: SpeedStep,MHz,BogoMIPS,timing.. Ari Heitner (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 20:43:19 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre9 Oops Bartosz Waszak (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:22:50 EST)
• RE: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Rainer Mager (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 19:45:36 EST)
• Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Justin T. Gibbs (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 22:02:26 EST)
• hotmail not dealing with ECN Jeremy Hansen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:43:46 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Juri Haberland (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:37:04 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 04:06:09 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lincoln Dale (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:12:30 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:26:53 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:31:02 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:30:29 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:38:44 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:43:32 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:49:38 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:10:21 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:15:32 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Helge Hafting (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 03:54:23 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Rick Jones (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:04:36 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Rusty Russell (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 02:11:52 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Cox (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 05:56:10 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Wagner (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 23:10:48 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Frank v Waveren (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 13:18:09 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 14:20:32 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Frank v Waveren (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 14:22:59 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 14:58:51 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 15:14:28 EST)
      • RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Schwartz (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:18:31 EST)
      • RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 18:09:27 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:11:59 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dominik Kubla (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 20:10:25 EST)
      • [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 23:35:43 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dominik Kubla (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 07:57:53 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Michael H. Warfield (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 10:45:27 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 14:30:07 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dominik Kubla (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 17:16:14 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 03:48:59 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:06:29 EST)
      • RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Schwartz (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 22:27:34 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Lang (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:58:15 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Johannes Erdfelt (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:24:20 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jeremy M. Dolan (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 00:06:53 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Florian Weimer (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:04:36 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Rogier Wolff (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 05:00:15 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Cox (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 05:46:40 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:37:49 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:32:34 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:40:36 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:44:26 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:44:53 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:44:47 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:03:42 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:14:42 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:24:27 EST)
      • ECN Simon Kirby (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:05:56 EST)
      • Re: ECN Andrea Arcangeli (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:12:38 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dominik Kubla (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:16:16 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:27:07 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dominik Kubla (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 17:26:40 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 17:30:56 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Marian Jancar (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:35:05 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:28:37 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Dax Kelson (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 20:59:46 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:51:53 EST)
      • Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allow it? List User (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:47:14 EST)
      • Re: ECN -? Anything _I_ need to do to allow it? Matti Aarnio (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 04:58:15 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:50:50 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:52:22 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:54:47 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:12:15 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:08:21 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:13:38 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:29:51 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Chris Ricker (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:55:51 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Henning P. Schmiedehausen (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:37:12 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:17:30 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jeremy M. Dolan (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:55:54 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:34:30 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Drago Goricanec (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:37:24 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:11:38 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Olaf Titz (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:19:23 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:10:58 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:39:36 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:46:13 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:50:31 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:57:33 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Thunder from the hill (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:18:04 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Thunder from the hill (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:15:30 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Brian May (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 22:03:55 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 02:53:25 EST)
  • RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Randal, Phil (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:04:03 EST)
    • Re: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Lars Marowsky-Bree (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:37:44 EST)
      • Re: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN James Sutherland (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:14:12 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Daniel Chemko (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:25:02 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Chris Meadors (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:43:06 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Thunder from the hill (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 09:57:28 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Tony Hoyle (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:18:05 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Henning P. Schmiedehausen (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:42:22 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Cox (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:45:43 EST)
      • Re: RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN Albert D. Cahalan (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 17:37:15 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Miquel van Smoorenburg (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:28:25 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN David Ford (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 16:21:23 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Helge Hafting (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:42:51 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Adam J. Richter (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:53:49 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:57:19 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Graham Murray (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:32:42 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Alan Shutko (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:15:28 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Stuart Lynne (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 16:52:26 EST)
    • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Michael H. Warfield (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 16:59:13 EST)
      • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Matti Aarnio (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 04:48:19 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Brian May (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 23:59:25 EST)
  • Re: hotmail not dealing with ECN Bernd Eckenfels (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 13:55:39 EST)
• Patches Alan Cox (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 01:11:18 EST)
  • Re: Patches David Woodhouse (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:08:02 EST)
    • Re: Patches David Woodhouse (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:23:43 EST)
    • Re: Patches Mike A. Harris (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:59:04 EST)
  • Re: Patches Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:31:45 EST)
    • Re: Patches Chris Wedgwood (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:41:54 EST)
      • Re: Patches Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:22:32 EST)
      • Re: Patches Marc Mutz (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 13:22:09 EST)
      • Re: Patches Thunder from the hill (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 09:41:29 EST)
    • Re: Patches Jeff Garzik (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:42:02 EST)
• How to determine what driver belongs to eth0 (ethX)? Ben Greear (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:12:20 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre3: kernel BUG at /usr/src/linux/include/linux/nfs_fs.h:167! Sturle Sunde (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 01:59:11 EST)
• Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardwarerelated? Manfred Spraul (Fri Jan 12 2001 - 15:54:31 EST)
• Can anybody help me regarding Remote Desktop Protocol Rahul (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 02:37:48 EST)
  • Re: Can anybody help me regarding Remote Desktop Protocol archan (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:37:22 EST)
• cpqfc in 2.4 ? Lars Marowsky-Bree (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:01:08 EST)
• fat32 corruption with 2.4.0 Heikki Lindholm (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 05:38:31 EST)
  • Re: fat32 corruption with 2.4.0 Nathan Walp (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:37:47 EST)
  • Re: fat32 corruption with 2.4.0 Nicolas GOUTTE (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:08:19 EST)
• Re: cddrive problem in Toshiba Laptop with 2.4.0-test11 kernel archan (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 06:42:46 EST)
• [UPDATE] Minor zerocopy updates... David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:16:08 EST)
• tiny patch for nfsd in 2.4.1-pre10 Luis Claudio R.Goncalves (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:38:45 EST)
• [Patch] Pushing the global kernel lock (aka BKL) Mark Hemment (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 07:50:26 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Kjartan Maraas (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 08:43:42 EST)
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mike A. Harris (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 16:40:28 EST)
    • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Peter 'Luna' Runestig (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:12:53 EST)
      • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mark van Walraven (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 20:24:32 EST)
• [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:16:45 EST)
  • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) Tobias Ringstrom (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:52:55 EST)
    • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:23:32 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) Tigran Aivazian (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:40:30 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:42:12 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) James H. Cloos Jr. (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:10:51 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:40:16 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:02:12 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:40:40 EST)
      • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) Chris Wedgwood (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:09:59 EST)
  • Re: [UPDATE] Zerocopy, last one today I promise :-) Anton Blanchard (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:19:21 EST)
• megaraid 1.14e still broken Heitzso (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 09:29:39 EST)
  • RE: megaraid 1.14e still broken Margulies, Adam (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:33:39 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space] jekacur@ca.ibm.com (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:09:07 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space] Kevin B. Hendricks (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:10:40 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space] Dan Malek (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:11:59 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space] Kevin B. Hendricks (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:44:47 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space] jekacur@ca.ibm.com (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:50:48 EST)
• hdlc interface in 2.2.18 is not in 2.4.0 Ralph Blach (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:20:57 EST)
  • Re: hdlc interface in 2.2.18 is not in 2.4.0 Paul Fulghum (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:13:19 EST)
  • Re: hdlc interface in 2.2.18 is not in 2.4.0 Alan Cox (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:33:50 EST)
• SD: infinite loop. Rogier Wolff (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:28:58 EST)
• question about kernel upgrade and UDF DVD Jie Zhou (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 10:49:06 EST)
• Teledat USB 2 a/b Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:27:34 EST)
  • RE: Teledat USB 2 a/b Dunlap, Randy (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:01:50 EST)
• Benchmark: khttpd vs. boa vs. apache: khttpd 2-3 times faster than apache Christoph Lameter (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:23:54 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Ondrej Sury (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:23:26 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Chris Mason (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:07:08 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Ondrej Sury (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:51:33 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Chris Mason (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:03:56 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Ondrej Sury (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:03:56 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Tim Fletcher (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:05:55 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Ondrej Sury (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:18:04 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Tim Fletcher (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:25:16 EST)
      • ACPI error in 2.4.1-pre10 @ via82c686 (Was: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot.) Ondrej Sury (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:37:16 EST)
      • Re: ACPI error in 2.4.1-pre10 @ via82c686 (Was: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot.) Chris Mason (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:56:12 EST)
  • RE: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. David Christensen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:16:50 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Terje Rosten (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:23:11 EST)
  • RE: 2.4.1-pre10 slowdown at boot. Grover, Andrew (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:28:11 EST)
• megaraid 1.14e works with updated firmware Heitzso (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:35:19 EST)
• Fwd: bug report for matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:38:37 EST)
• patchlet for cs46xx Pete Zaitcev (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 11:47:07 EST)
  • Re: patchlet for cs46xx Richard B. Johnson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:41:28 EST)
    • Re: patchlet for cs46xx Jens Axboe (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:59:49 EST)
      • Re: patchlet for cs46xx Richard B. Johnson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:05:38 EST)
• Can't umount floppies/zip in Kernel 2.4.0 Mauricio Martinez (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:26:12 EST)
• x86 PAT errata Mikael Pettersson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:45:16 EST)
  • Re: x86 PAT errata Jeff Hartmann (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:51:32 EST)
  • Re: x86 PAT errata Mikael Pettersson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:12:09 EST)
  • Re: x86 PAT errata H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:28:32 EST)
    • Re: x86 PAT errata Jeff Hartmann (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:35:53 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Jamie Lokier (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 12:58:16 EST)
• [PATCH] POSIX timers for 2.4.0 Robert H. de Vries (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:12:48 EST)
• Re: problem with dd for floppy under 2.4.0 Jamie Lokier (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:27:21 EST)
• hotmail can't deal with ECN Jeremy Hansen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:29:24 EST)
  • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:34:47 EST)
    • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Albert D. Cahalan (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:05:35 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:13:03 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Jeremy Hansen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:29:28 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN mirabilos (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:30:56 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN alex@foogod.com (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:52:14 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN mirabilos (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:13:32 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Helge Hafting (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 03:56:54 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN James H. Cloos Jr. (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:19:37 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:37:37 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN CaT (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:50:57 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Jan Niehusmann (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:59:01 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN CaT (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:03:12 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Alan Cox (Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:13:18 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:04:23 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN CaT (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:08:31 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN James Sutherland (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:04:58 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Chris Wedgwood (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:14:14 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:09:09 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Steven N. Hirsch (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:55:00 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Michael B. Trausch (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:51:35 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Thunder from the hill (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:44:31 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Thunder from the hill (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 08:54:07 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Michael B. Trausch (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 02:21:20 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 02:35:44 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN David S. Miller (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 02:44:22 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Michael B. Trausch (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 03:51:13 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN H. Peter Anvin (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 04:33:31 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Michael B. Trausch (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 04:54:44 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Chris Wedgwood (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:15:45 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Steven N. Hirsch (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 07:51:47 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Gregory Maxwell (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:10:38 EST)
    • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Chris Wedgwood (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:12:20 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN David S. Miller (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:37:17 EST)
      • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Thunder from the hill (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:13:17 EST)
    • Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Helge Hafting (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:29:05 EST)
• Re: mrproper mirabilos (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 13:49:55 EST)
• non-random IP IDs Alexandre Hautequest (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:40:50 EST)
  • Re: non-random IP IDs David S. Miller (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:02:22 EST)
• Looking for a Linux/SCSI Driver Developer John Carter (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 14:48:29 EST)
• eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Micah Gorrell (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:20:03 EST)
  • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Sergey Kubushin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:29:59 EST)
  • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Tom Sightler (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:44:47 EST)
  • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Micah Gorrell (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:54:37 EST)
    • [PATCH] Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Jeff Garzik (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:05:08 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Jeff Garzik (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:19:27 EST)
      • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Andrey Savochkin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:50:37 EST)
      • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Jeff Garzik (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 11:30:40 EST)
    • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Sergey Kubushin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:06:14 EST)
  • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Torben Mathiasen (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:13:37 EST)
  • Re: eepro100 problems in 2.4.0 Andrey Savochkin (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:13:18 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx.c check request_region's return code (241p9)] Rasmus Andersen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:26:55 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx.c check request_region's return code (241p9)] Gérard Roudier (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 06:38:50 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:41:51 EST)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:07:11 EST)
    • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix alex@foogod.com (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:03:53 EST)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:20:55 EST)
    • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:46:40 EST)
• Oops with bonding (2.4.0, 2.4.0-ac11) Pfenniger Daniel (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:44:21 EST)
• Re:sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space, another hack. jekacur@ca.ibm.com (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 15:31:38 EST)
• In kernel 2.4.0 in alloc_uhci when doing request_irq() Thunder from the hill (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:23:18 EST)
  • Re: In kernel 2.4.0 in alloc_uhci when doing request_irq() Johannes Erdfelt (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:36:06 EST)
  • In kernel 2.4.0 in alloc_uhci when doing request_irq() Thunder from the hill (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:47:33 EST)
• Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Ian S. Nelson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:46:01 EST)
  • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:26:36 EST)
    • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Matthew Dharm (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:31:27 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:32:41 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Matthew Dharm (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:41:52 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:45:27 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:08:11 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:10:36 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:58:03 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:19:58 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT David Welch (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:54:33 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Paul Gortmaker (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 21:35:47 EST)
    • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Rogier Wolff (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 05:20:04 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 15:47:59 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Rogier Wolff (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 16:01:02 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 16:24:48 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Rogier Wolff (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 05:12:08 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 05:18:19 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Rogier Wolff (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 06:03:09 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Jamie Lokier (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 12:22:15 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Pavel Machek (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 17:34:25 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:09:51 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT H. Peter Anvin (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 14:21:04 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Pavel Machek (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 17:29:43 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Mark H. Wood (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 12:44:58 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 13:10:28 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT mirabilos (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 13:16:29 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 13:36:26 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT mirabilos (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 13:41:33 EST)
  • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Petr Vandrovec (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 09:44:52 EST)
    • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:07:44 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Mark Hahn (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:15:02 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:31:03 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:03:22 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Jamie Lokier (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:22:56 EST)
  • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Manfred Spraul (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:42:54 EST)
    • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Richard B. Johnson (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:07:37 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Brian Gerst (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:33:31 EST)
      • Re: Linux Post codes during runtime, possibly OT Pavel Machek (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 07:28:47 EST)
• "no such 386 instruction" with gcc 2.95.2 David L. Nicol (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:46:48 EST)
  • Re: "no such 386 instruction" with gcc 2.95.2 Brian Gerst (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:51:53 EST)
  • Re: "no such 386 instruction" with gcc 2.95.2 Pavel Machek (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 05:17:59 EST)
    • Re: "no such 386 instruction" with gcc 2.95.2 Matti Aarnio (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 10:23:12 EST)
  • Re: "no such 386 instruction" with gcc 2.95.2 Jakob Schroeter (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 10:05:27 EST)
• [PATCH] eliminate #ifdef in parport_pc.c by adding empty entry in pci.h (241p10) Rasmus Andersen (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:49:39 EST)
• Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:47:31 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Daniel Phillips (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 17:51:54 EST)
• pcmcia delay causes bootp not to work Ookhoi (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:00:07 EST)
  • Re: pcmcia delay causes bootp not to work David Woodhouse (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:09:23 EST)
  • Re: pcmcia delay causes bootp not to work David Woodhouse (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:11:09 EST)
    • Re: pcmcia delay causes bootp not to work Ookhoi (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:15:38 EST)
• RE: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Leif Sawyer (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:15:47 EST)
  • RE: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Steven N. Hirsch (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:41:12 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre8 losing pages Peter Horton (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:16:59 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8 losing pages Xuan Baldauf (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:28:39 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8 losing pages Peter Horton (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:24:12 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.1-pre8 losing pages Peter Horton (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:46:05 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre8 losing pages Russell King (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 14:48:05 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre8 losing pages Peter Horton (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 07:11:47 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.1-pre8 losing pages Andre Hedrick (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:33:08 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac11: small NTFS fixes Anton Altaparmakov (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:17:49 EST)
• A NFS/LFS patch for kernel 2.4.0 H . J . Lu (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:41:33 EST)
• 2.2.19pre6/7: why can't I dump core? Rafal Boni (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 18:41:32 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.19pre6/7: why can't I dump core? Bernd Eckenfels (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:21:46 EST)
  • Re: 2.2.19pre6/7: why can't I dump core? Rafal Boni (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 16:21:30 EST)
• 2.2.18 + VM-global + reiserfs + ext3 0.0.5e safe? Matthias Andree (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 19:02:02 EST)
• SERVERWORKS (READ ME) please.... Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 20:41:38 EST)
• 2.4 extreme slowdown and crash Vibol Hou (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 21:10:20 EST)
• ECN and other sites Michael B. Trausch (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 22:20:10 EST)
  • Re: ECN and other sites David Ford (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 22:17:52 EST)
  • Re: ECN and other sites Walter Hofmann (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:54:30 EST)
• Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Mark Bratcher (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 22:29:36 EST)
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs qkholland@my-deja.com (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:34:52 EST)
    • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Jens Axboe (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:28:11 EST)
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Mark Bratcher (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 10:27:03 EST)
    • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Jens Axboe (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:43:00 EST)
      • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Mark Bratcher (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 21:50:30 EST)
      • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Mircea Damian (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 07:10:02 EST)
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Andreas Franck (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 08:01:20 EST)
    • Re: Kernel 2.4.0 loop device still hangs Jens Axboe (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 14:43:08 EST)
• mapping physical memory Dima Brodsky (Thu Jan 25 2001 - 22:53:17 EST)
  • Re: mapping physical memory Dan Maas (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:39:38 EST)
    • Re: mapping physical memory Pauline Middelink (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:28:56 EST)
• [PATCH](s): Use spinlocks instead of STI/CLI in SoundBlaster Chris Rankin (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 01:42:27 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH](s): Use spinlocks instead of STI/CLI in SoundBlaster Chris Rankin (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:25:58 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH](s): Use spinlocks instead of STI/CLI in SoundBlaster Pavel Machek (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 05:26:29 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH](s): Use spinlocks instead of STI/CLI in SoundBlaster Chris Rankin (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 06:02:57 EST)
• Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Michael B. Trausch (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 02:34:20 EST)
  • Re: Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Georg Nikodym (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:26:53 EST)
    • Re: Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Michael B. Trausch (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 12:47:54 EST)
      • Re: Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Barry K. Nathan (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 15:57:02 EST)
      • Re: Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Tom Sightler (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 16:11:01 EST)
      • Re: Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Zach Brown (Tue Jan 30 2001 - 03:31:31 EST)
      • Re: Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Michael B. Trausch (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:43:05 EST)
      • Re: Possible Bug: drivers/sound/maestro.c Alan Cox (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:47:32 EST)
• 2.4.0 uptime Hans Eric Sandström (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 02:37:38 EST)
  • 2.4.0 quality [was: 2.4.0 uptime] Ville Herva (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 11:47:13 EST)
• 2.4.0-pre10 -- Unresolved symbols in smctr.o and comx.o Miles Lane (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 03:10:22 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre10 -- Unresolved symbols in smctr.o and comx.o Jeff Garzik (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 10:06:57 EST)
• Re: Running "make install" runs lilo on my Athlon but not my Pentium II. Miles Lane (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:08:31 EST)
  • Re: Running "make install" runs lilo on my Athlon but not my Pentium II. Chmouel Boudjnah (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 08:21:36 EST)
• 2.4.0-ac10 crashed Andreas Jellinghaus (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:18:41 EST)
• RE: Marking sectors on IDE drives as bad Wahlman, Petter (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:36:41 EST)
  • Re: Marking sectors on IDE drives as bad Andrzej Krzysztofowicz (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 05:49:36 EST)
• patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Stefani Seibold (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:05:10 EST)
  • patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Stefani Seibold (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 15:46:02 EST)
    • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk David Weinehall (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 16:13:36 EST)
    • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Stefani Seibold (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 17:31:35 EST)
      • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Andrew Morton (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 19:44:38 EST)
      • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Stefani Seibold (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 04:27:24 EST)
      • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Jamie Lokier (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 12:32:33 EST)
      • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Paul Gortmaker (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 21:48:08 EST)
  • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Thunder from the hill (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 19:09:31 EST)
    • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Stefani Seibold (Sat Jan 27 2001 - 05:57:14 EST)
      • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk James Simmons (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:40:45 EST)
      • Re: patch for 2.4.0 disable printk Stefani Seibold (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 15:17:54 EST)
• kernel 2.4.0 bug report Christian Becker (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 06:59:59 EST)
• Re: kapm-idled and cpu heating ... Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:23:02 EST)
• Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Pavel Machek (Fri Jan 26 2001 - 04:14:22 EST)
  • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 08:14:28 EST)
    • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Bill Huey (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 09:07:04 EST)
      • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Andrew Morton (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 09:26:47 EST)
      • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 00:02:08 EST)
    • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Andrew Morton (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 09:19:37 EST)
      • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Joe deBlaquiere (Sun Jan 28 2001 - 11:17:46 EST)
      • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:44:10 EST)
      • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Joe deBlaquiere (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:23:24 EST)
      • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com (Mon Jan 29 2001 - 12:38:10 EST)