Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix

• Next message: Nathan Straz: "Re: What test suites can you tell me about?"
• Previous message: Ben Greear: "Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
• In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Reply: David L. Parsley: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > I'll take a look at the ramfs one. I may have broken something else when fixing
> > everything else with ramfs (like unlink) crashing
>
> Ehh.. Plain 2.4.0 ramfs is fine, assuming you add a "UnlockPage()" to
> ramfs_writepage(). So what do you mean by "fixing everything else"?

-ac has the rather extended ramfs with resource limits and stuff. That one
also has rather more extended bugs 8). AFAIK none of those are in the vanilla
ramfs code

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Nathan Straz: "Re: What test suites can you tell me about?"
• Previous message: Ben Greear: "Re: routable interfaces WAS( Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup(DoesNOT meet Linus' sumission policy!)"
• In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Reply: David L. Parsley: "Re: Patch (repost): cramfs memory corruption fix"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:30 EST