Re: Even slower NFS mounting with 2.4.0

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Jan 07 2001 - 12:33:09 EST


> Hmm... How should we respond to that sort of thing? In principle the
> NFS layer supposes that if we have a hard mount, then unreachable
> ports etc are a temporary problem, and we should wait them out. (In
> fact, I've made an RPC 'ping' routine that improves on that behaviour
> but which unfortunately didn't make it into 2.4.0.)

That makes reasonable sense once mounted. I think mount needs to be polite
until it decides the mount is made

> If we want to check that the port is reachable at the moment when we
> mount, I think we should concentrate on making 'mount' more
> intelligent. Perhaps have it RPC-ping the various ports (including the
> local portmapper when we specify locking)?

That would work.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:29 EST