Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions

From: Christoph.Hellwig (hchÀcaldera.de)
Date: Fri Jan 05 2001 - 12:23:09 EST

Next message: Laramie Leavitt: "2.4 Kernel Lockup"
Previous message: George R. Kasica: "2.4.0 Module compile error"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <E14EaSo-00083x-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
>> In other words, there's no longer any such thing as a "stable" branch. The
>> whole point of having separate production and development branches was to have
>> one in which each succeeding patch could be counted upon to be more reliable

> By your personal definition of stable 2.0.3x is the current stable kernel.

Btw: Any chance to see an official 2.0.39 soon?
2.0.39final is out for about half a year now...

Christoph

-- 
Whip me.  Beat me.  Make me maintain AIX.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Laramie Leavitt: "2.4 Kernel Lockup"
Previous message: George R. Kasica: "2.4.0 Module compile error"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Change of policy for future 2.2 driver submissions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:22 EST