Re: [PATCH] dcache 2nd chance replacement

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 11:59:49 EST


On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> This is totally offtopic. We were _not_ talking about other
> algorithms. We were _only_ talking about _when_ the 1 bit of
> aging I introduced with my algorithm improves performance at
> max. My answer is that the max performance improvement happens
> when there's the _highest_ VFS load in background and you
> disagreed. Everything else has nothing to do with this our
> previous discussion so your above reply partly still doesn't
> make sense to me.

Not only did I disagree, I also explained you why it
doesn't work the way you envision.

Unfortunately you seem to ignore my arguments, so lets
close this thread.

EOT,

Rik

--
Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
	Trailer at 11.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:18 EST