Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits

From: Dan Hollis (goemon@anime.net)
Date: Wed Jan 03 2001 - 17:07:14 EST

Next message: Nicolas Noble: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Previous message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [PATCH] isdn iprofd hang ttyI1..."
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > without breaking anything. It also reports of such calls by using printk.
> Get real.

Why do you always have to be insulting alex? Sheesh.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nicolas Noble: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Previous message: Kai Germaschewski: "Re: [PATCH] isdn iprofd hang ttyI1..."
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bug exploits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:00:16 EST