Re: [Patch] shmmin behaviour back to 2.2 behaviour

From: Alan Cox (
Date: Thu Dec 28 2000 - 10:49:30 EST

> > So should we go for SUSv2?
> No.
> I regard shm* as obsolete. New programs will probably not use it.
> So, the less we change the better. Moreover, the SUSv2 text is broken.

There are fundmental things shm* can do that mmap cannot. Does posix shm
handle those (leaving segments alive but unattached being the obvious one)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 31 2000 - 21:00:11 EST