On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The (trivial) patch below should fix this problem.
It must be wrong.
If we have a dirty page on the LRU lists, that page _must_ have a mapping.
What semantics would you say a non-mapped page has? What are the LRU
routines supposed to do with such a page?
The bug is somewhere else, and your patch is just papering it over. We
should not have a page without a mapping on the LRU lists in the first
place, except if the page has anonymous buffers (and such a page cannot
legally be dirty as things are in the standard kernel - Chris Mason has
been working on stuff that would make that a normal thing, but it would
also make the page have a mapping).
We'd better add a debug check that makes sure that we don't have
non-mapped non-buffer pages on the LRU lists, and figure out how such a
thing could happen.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 31 2000 - 21:00:10 EST