Re: IDE woes:linux and BIOS won't agree on C/H/S detection

From: Guest section DW (dwguest@win.tue.nl)
Date: Fri Dec 22 2000 - 10:34:47 EST

Next message: Michael Rothwell: "Re: iptables: "stateful inspection?""
Previous message: Tim Wright: "Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup"
In reply to: Ishikawa: "Re: IDE woes:linux and BIOS won't agree on C/H/S detection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:11:41AM +0900, Ishikawa wrote:

> I have to think more deeply then what the best measure would be.

I suppose you can get all systems involved to agree on 255 heads
if you select LBA in the BIOS.

Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Rothwell: "Re: iptables: "stateful inspection?""
Previous message: Tim Wright: "Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup"
In reply to: Ishikawa: "Re: IDE woes:linux and BIOS won't agree on C/H/S detection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:31 EST