On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 04:37:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This looks bogus.
It may be - I just did what Al told me without really understanding it ;-)
The test I did initially was the following:
if(!atomic_read(&bh->b_count) &&
(destroy_dirty_buffers || !buffer_dirty(bh))
&& ! (bh->b_page && bh->b_page->mapping)
)
That is, I was explicitely checking for a mapped page. It worked well, too.
Is this more reasonable?
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:30 EST