Re: iptables: "stateful inspection?"

From: Michael Rothwell (rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 21:37:18 EST


Alan Cox wrote:

> There have been at least five holes found in pile that _could_ have been
> [speech]
> safe is the day you end up hurt.

Your specific example of an executable (windows) attachment, not buffer
overflows, etc. what what I was replying to. In general, you are
correct. Now, how about including that procfs cleanup patch that I sent,
and maybe the 64-bit printk patch? :)

-M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:27 EST