I'm thinking arch/i386/kernel/acpi.c should just go away, yes?
Its purpose is probably better served by an ifdef, like you mentioned.
Regards -- Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam J. Richter [mailto:adam@yggdrasil.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 5:01 PM
> To: acme@conectiva.com.br; acpi@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [Acpi] 2.4.0-test13pre3 acpi circular dependency
>
>
> Although the stock linux-2.4.0-test13pre3 does not allow
> one to build the acpi interpreter as a loadable module, I had
> tweaked the Makefiles in previous kernels to do this (the supporting
> code is there and it seemed to work, at least for shutting off the
> power after a shutdown). Unfortunately, in 2.4.0-test13pre3, this
> is no harder to do, because there is a circular dependency:
>
> drivers/acpi/ references acpi_get_rsdp_ptr in arch/i386/kernel/acpi.c,
> and
> arch/i386/kernel/acpi.c references acp_find_root_pointer in
> drivers/acpi/.
>
>
> I would like to recommend that the contents of
> arch/i{386,a64}/kernel/acpi.c be merged back somewhere in
> drivers/acpi/,
> and just selected with Makefile options, ifdefs, or perhaps runtime
> options (if the ia64 code is potentionally useable to an i386 kernel
> that find itself running on an ia64 CPU, which will probably
> be the case
> with most Linux distributions initially installed on ia64 hardware).
>
> If need be, I would be willing to at least write a quick and
> dirty #ifdef-based version of this proposed change.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST