Re: USB-related Oops in test12

From: Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Date: Fri Dec 15 2000 - 09:37:29 EST

Next message: Ed Tomlinson: "[lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18"
Previous message: Jon 'maddog' Hall, Executive Director, Linux International: "Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?"
In reply to: Adam Huffman: "USB-related Oops in test12"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 02:29:40PM +0000, Adam Huffman wrote:
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000c
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0010:[<d086734b>]
> Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
> EFLAGS: 00010246
> eax: 00000000 ebx: 00e08269 ecx: 00888105 edx: 0000000c
> esi: 00000004 edi: cfa84c40 ebp: cfabeb00 esp: c0259ec8
> ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
> Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage=c0259000)
> Stack: 00000000 cfabeb24 cfabc180 cff28cc0 cfa84c40 cff28cdc 00000000 d0867639
> cff28cc0 cfa84c40 00000020 00000002 00000000 cff28cdc cff28cc0 cff28cdc
> 00000000 d0867848 cff28cc0 cfa84c48 00000000 cfef0001 00000000 c02a7480
> Call Trace: [<d0867639>] [<d0867848>] [<c010c1bf>] [<c010c342>] [<c010afb0>] [<c01c3e62>] [<c01c3b80>]
> [<c0109150>] [<c01c3b80>] [<c011fc01>] [<c01091d8>] [<c0105000>] [<c0100191>]
> Code: 8b 04 82 c1 e9 08 83 e1 0f d3 e8 83 e0 01 c1 e0 13 09 45 08
>
> >>EIP; d086734b <[usb-uhci]process_interrupt+10b/1f0> <=====
> Trace; d0867639 <[usb-uhci]process_urb+79/1f0>
> Trace; d0867848 <[usb-uhci]uhci_interrupt+98/100>
> Trace; c010c1bf <handle_IRQ_event+2f/60>
> Trace; c010c342 <do_IRQ+72/c0>
> Trace; c010afb0 <ret_from_intr+0/20>
> Trace; c01c3e62 <acpi_idle+2e2/330>
> Trace; c01c3b80 <acpi_idle+0/330>
> Trace; c0109150 <default_idle+0/30>
> Trace; c01c3b80 <acpi_idle+0/330>
> Trace; c011fc01 <check_pgt_cache+11/20>
> Trace; c01091d8 <cpu_idle+38/50>

> Trace; c0105000 <empty_bad_page+0/1000>
> Trace; c0100191 <L6+0/2>

Once again we have these two symbols on the stack.

Anybody else, who thinks this might be related?

I've seen these two symbols on all ix86-Ooopses with no raid
involved.

Does anybody have an idea, why we always see these symbols there?

Is it an common bitmask? L6 (from arch/i386/head.S) is freed after boot AFAICS.

Regards

Ingo Oeser

-- 
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<       come and join the fun       >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ed Tomlinson: "[lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18"
Previous message: Jon 'maddog' Hall, Executive Director, Linux International: "Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?"
In reply to: Adam Huffman: "USB-related Oops in test12"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:32 EST