Re: [patch] 2.4.0-test12:

From: Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Dec 13 2000 - 18:30:15 EST

Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: test1[12] + sparc + bind 9.1.0b1 == bad things"
Previous message: safemode: "IDE bugs for intel 440LX chipset in Test12?"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [patch] 2.4.0-test12:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:11:55PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Perhaps it should mention that the guaranteed useful range of atomic_t
> is only 24bit ? Documentation without source would rather useless if it
> didn't mention such pitfalls.

Does
<URL:ftp://people.redhat.com/twaugh/patches/linux24/linux-macrodoc.patch>
look better?

Tim.
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: test1[12] + sparc + bind 9.1.0b1 == bad things"
Previous message: safemode: "IDE bugs for intel 440LX chipset in Test12?"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [patch] 2.4.0-test12:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST