Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS<=>UNIX in FAT, NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]

From: Urban Widmark (urban@teststation.com)
Date: Wed Dec 13 2000 - 15:23:52 EST

Next message: alex@foogod.com: "Re: [patch] I-Opener fix (again)"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Signal 11 - the continuing saga"
In reply to: Igor Yu. Zhbanov: "Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS<=>UNIX in FAT, NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Igor Yu. Zhbanov wrote:

> I think your testprogram is broken (or else my testprogram is broken :).

Yes, you were right. Mine must have been broken (possibly caused by
trying to make it readable :). Thanks.

Alan, if you still have the patch please apply it to smbfs in 2.2
(and possibly fat too, I assume it is the same). If you don't I'll send it
again for 2.2.19pre2 or so.

/Urban

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: alex@foogod.com: "Re: [patch] I-Opener fix (again)"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Signal 11 - the continuing saga"
In reply to: Igor Yu. Zhbanov: "Re: [PATCH] Bug in date converting functions DOS<=>UNIX in FAT, NCPFS and SMBFS drivers [second attempt]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST