[PATCH] timer.h obsolete comments

From: Pavel Rabel (pavel@web.sajt.cz)
Date: Tue Dec 12 2000 - 18:01:07 EST


Hi Linus,

Are the old static timers gone completely?
Some comments are either obsolete or out of place.

Pavel Rabel

--- include/linux/timer.h.old Tue Dec 12 22:07:35 2000
+++ include/linux/timer.h Tue Dec 12 22:09:28 2000
@@ -5,13 +5,9 @@
 #include <linux/list.h>
 
 /*
- * This is completely separate from the above, and is the
+ * Old-style "hardcoded" timers are gone, this is the
  * "new and improved" way of handling timers more dynamically.
  * Hopefully efficient and general enough for most things.
- *
- * The "hardcoded" timers above are still useful for well-
- * defined problems, but the timer-list is probably better
- * when you need multiple outstanding timers or similar.
  *
  * The "data" field is in case you want to use the same
  * timeout function for several timeouts. You can use this

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:25 EST