On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
i know they talked AC at some point about getting a patch in, but
nothing seems to have come from it.
what a damm damm shame. we've got code that appears to work really
well[1] to drive most of the hardware sensors out there - but the
code is used by only a tiny fraction of linux users cause these guys
/apparently/ would much rather keep themselves and their code
isolated in some god forsaken CVS server rather than submit their
code to Linus.
fscking shame.
-- Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt ------------------------------------------- Fortune: Ten persons who speak make more noise than ten thousand who are silent. -- Napoleon I[1]. i only had very slight problems with module ref counts earlier in its devel cycle.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:23 EST