Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug?

From: Mark Hahn (hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca)
Date: Mon Dec 11 2000 - 14:28:11 EST


> Technical merits and voter intent aside, this behavior is misleading and
> inconsistent with previous kernels. Tools like top or a CPU dock applet show

the goal of kernel revision is *not* to remain consistent with old stuff.

> a constantly loaded CPU. Hacking them to deduct the load from 'kapm-idled'
> seems like the wrong answer.

so don't run APM already.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 15 2000 - 21:00:22 EST