Re: test12pre6: BUG in schedule (sched.c, 115)

From: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (ragnar_hojland@eresmas.com)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 23:40:57 EST

Next message: Daniel Walton: "Out of socket memory? (2.4.0-test11)"
Previous message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: 64bit offsets for block devices ?"
In reply to: Mike Kravetz: "Re: test12pre6: BUG in schedule (sched.c, 115)"
Next in thread: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: test12pre6: BUG in schedule (sched.c, 115)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 02:00:12PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Ragnar,
>
> Are you sure that was line 115? Could it have been line 515?

Yes, yes, it was 515. 115 is the result of human cache corruption ;)

> Also, do you have any Oops data?

It just froze there.

-- 
____/|  Ragnar Højland     Freedom - Linux - OpenGL      Fingerprint  94C4B
\ o.O|                                                   2F0D27DE025BE2302C
 =(_)=  "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for      104B78C56 B72F0822
   U     chaos and madness await thee at its end."       hkp://keys.pgp.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Walton: "Out of socket memory? (2.4.0-test11)"
Previous message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: 64bit offsets for block devices ?"
In reply to: Mike Kravetz: "Re: test12pre6: BUG in schedule (sched.c, 115)"
Next in thread: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: test12pre6: BUG in schedule (sched.c, 115)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:00:16 EST