> Alan, what's the approach you'd feel more comfortable with:
> - One ioctl that passes a pointer to a known structure in ifr.ifr_data as
> its argument.
> - Several ioctl's, one for each parameter, that pass only the specific
> parameter new value as the argument.
>
> The former is good because it relies on a _single_ ioctl. However, every
> time you change the ioctl structure you may lose backward compatibility.
One ioctl with a set of subcommands seems to be quite common
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST