Re: Using map_user_kiobuf()

• Next message: Taco IJsselmuiden: "Re: ip_nat_ftp and different ports"
• Previous message: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "[PATCH] pci_read_bases trivial fixup"
• In reply to: John Meikle: "RE: Using map_user_kiobuf()"
• Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Using map_user_kiobuf()"
• Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Using map_user_kiobuf()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:15:55AM -0000, John Meikle wrote:

    Changing the WRITE to READ does solve the problem, thank you.
    
    I am still confused about why the code failed the way it did. The module
    managed to write to the full 1,000,000, and the user programme could read it
    and verify it was correct. Just nothing else worked after that!
    
    Am I the only one who finds the READ/WRITE option back to front?
    
No, I was just thinking it should be change to USER_READ, USER_WRITE
or something a little more obvious.

Stephen?

  --cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Taco IJsselmuiden: "Re: ip_nat_ftp and different ports"
• Previous message: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "[PATCH] pci_read_bases trivial fixup"
• In reply to: John Meikle: "RE: Using map_user_kiobuf()"
• Next in thread: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Using map_user_kiobuf()"
• Reply: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: Using map_user_kiobuf()"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 21:00:13 EST