Re: [PATCH] New user space serial port driver

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@bitwizard.nl)
Date: Thu Nov 30 2000 - 04:47:34 EST


Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Patrick van de Lageweg wrote:
> > +static struct tty_struct * ussp_table[USSP_MAX_PORTS] = { NULL, };
>
> this wastes at least 4 * USSP_MAX_PORTS bytes in the kernel image.
> Typically around 64 bytes but could be more. For more info see the recent
> silly flamewars on the list.

And I think the guys who were saying that the "documentation is more
important than those few bytes" were winning.

I am one of those guys. I think the documentation aspect is much more
important than those 64 bytes.

> The correct way is not to initialize the data
> to zero explicitly as BSS is cleared automatically on boot. It is also
> probably documented in the lkml FAQ at the bottom of this message.
>
> Also, it makes your code look consistent as, e.g. in cases below you do
> the right thing:
>
> > +static struct termios * ussp_termios[USSP_MAX_PORTS];
> > +static struct termios * ussp_termios_locked[USSP_MAX_PORTS];

this SHOULD mean that these are first initialized before use.

If you think they can be used before first being initialized by the
code, then that's a bug, and I'll look into it.

                        Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:24 EST