Re: About IP address

From: Bernd Petrovitsch (bernd@gams.at)
Date: Tue Nov 28 2000 - 04:46:20 EST

Next message: Lukasz Trabinski: "Re: test-10 tulip "eth0 timed out" (smp, heavy IDE use)"
Previous message: Christian Gennerat: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
In reply to: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: About IP address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

To throw additional information (or confusion or simply wrong stuff?) in :

In message <20001127163217.B20394@alcove.wittsend.com>, "Michael H. Warfield" w
rote:
> I have been unable to find any documentation in the RFCs
>which lay claim to restricting 128.0.*.* or 191.255.*.*. The fact

RFC1940, though it's "only" informational, bottom of page 7 :
--- snip ---
Source Route (variable)

The components of the source route are syntactically IP
addresses.

         An IP address from network 128.0.0.0 is used to encode a next
         hop that is a domain. The least significant two octets contain
         the DI, which is an Internet Autonomous System number.
--- snip ---

Bernd

-- Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@gams.at G.A.M.S GmbH Fax : +43 1 8958499-60 Stiegerg. 15-17/8 A-1150 Vienna/Austria/Europe LUGA : http://www.luga.at

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Lukasz Trabinski: "Re: test-10 tulip "eth0 timed out" (smp, heavy IDE use)"
Previous message: Christian Gennerat: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
In reply to: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: About IP address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:19 EST