On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011212300590.950-100000@penguin.homenet> you write:
> > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:25:01 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Quick removal of unnecessary initialization to 0.
> >
> > Quite the contrary. The patch seems correct and useful to me. What do you
> > think is wrong with it? (Linus accepted megabytes worth of the above in
> > the past...)
>
> What irritates about these monkey-see-monkey-do patches is that if I
> initialize a variable to NULL, it's because my code actually relies on
> it; I don't want that information eliminated.
What irritates about these monkey-do-not-read-monkey-write e-mails
is that I know what I am doing :) My patch removed *REALLY* unnecessary
initialization, no code depended on beginning value so don't quote
my words...
-- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bkz@linux-ide.org>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:14 EST