Re: "Hyper-Mount" option possible???

• Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: 2.4.0-test11: "_isofs_bmap: block < 0""
• Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: PROBLEM: crashing kernels"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

** Reply to message from Robert L Martin <robertlmarti@earthlink.net> on Thu,
23 Nov 2000 10:55:38 -0500

> Soo Given that Super-Mount is already taken, How about (in
> 2.5??) hashing out a Hypermount option.

How about calling it "multi-mount"? I think it's more accurate.

-- 
Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please direct the reply to the mailing list only.  Don't send another copy to me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: 2.4.0-test11: "_isofs_bmap: block < 0""
• Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: PROBLEM: crashing kernels"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 21:00:14 EST