> From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com]
>
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:29:15AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > If we are going to create CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG, we must -eliminate-
> > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG, and create CONFIG_PCI_HOTPLUG, and
> > > CONFIG_ANOTHERBUS_HOTPLUG and so on, for each hotplug bus.
> >
> > Argh!
> > I thought the whole point of this was to make there be only
> one hotplug
> > strategy, due to the fact that this is a real need.
> >
> > Please let's not go down this path. It was all starting to look so
> > nice...
>
> I -want- there to be only one hotplug strategy, but Adam seemed to be
> talking about the opposite, with his CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG suggestion.
I told Adam that I didn't want that patch, but it's not
up to me now.
> I'm hoping that Linus will disagree with the splintering of
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG too...
And JE.
> I think it's too late in 2.4.x cycle to change now anyway.
And I told Adam that also.
> Jeff
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:28 EST