On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 05:15:53PM -0800, Steve VanDevender wrote:
> Jeff V. Merkey writes:
> > There was also an issue relative to how sendmail is interpreting load
> > average on a linux box. hpa@transmeta.com pointed out that perhaps you
> > are not factoring sleeping processes, which Linux does -- a deviation
> > from BSD's interpretation of load average.
>
> At worst it's an issue with how Linux presents load average, not with
> how sendmail interprets it -- sendmail believes what the kernel tells
> it. And from the sound of it, it's not even Linux's fault -- your box
> has a high load average because it's got a lot of runnable processes.
>
> > With a handle like
> > "Assmann", deviation is proably something you already understand quite
> > well ...
>
> Don't be a moron. Claus is German, Assman really is his last name and
> not some "handle", and it's pronounced "Oss-man".
>
> I'm sure we could make plenty of stupid puns with "Merkey" too.
I had no idea, I was making a joke. It looked like a handle, I apologize
for being culturally ignorant of being able to distinguishing it.
8)
jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:18 EST