Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]

• Next message: Pavel Machek: "[BUG] coda went from c 67 5 to c 67 0 [was Re: mount -tcoda /dev/cfs0 /mnt no longer works in -test9 and newer?]"
• Previous message: Reto Baettig: "Re: threads"
• In reply to: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 10, 2000, Davide Libenzi wrote:

[Please use a MTA that sends the e-mail only once to a given machine,
we got three copies of this]

> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > > Looks like your bug. As an FYI, sendmail.rpms in Suse, RedHat, and
> > > OpenLinux all exhibit this behavior, which means they're all broken.
> >
> > Sorry, this is plain wrong. sendmail does NOT read the entire
> > file into memory.
>
> Does sendmail use sendfile() ?

No. Just do a grep on the source code.

I suspect that procmail is used which actually used to load
the entire mail into memory.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Pavel Machek: "[BUG] coda went from c 67 5 to c 67 0 [was Re: mount -tcoda /dev/cfs0 /mnt no longer works in -test9 and newer?]"
• Previous message: Reto Baettig: "Re: threads"
• In reply to: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [Fwd: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:17 EST