Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem

From: Paweł Kot (pkot@linuxnews.pl)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 12:36:29 EST

Next message: michael@pmcl.ph.utexas.edu: "intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: test11-pre2 compile error undefined reference to `bust_spinlocks' WHAT?!"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, [iso-8859-2] Paweł Kot wrote:
>
> > NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, registers:
>
> > What can be wrong?
>
> You forgot to read the REPORTING-BUGS file.
>
> You told us everything except the really
> important information ... the backtrace from
> the info printed by the NMI Oopser...

No ooops was generated. Or at least I can't find it. On console there was
the only line. There's nothing in logs.

regards
pkot

-- mailto:pkot@linuxnews.pl http://urtica.linuxnews.pl/~pkot/ http://newsreader.linuxnews.pl/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: michael@pmcl.ph.utexas.edu: "intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: test11-pre2 compile error undefined reference to `bust_spinlocks' WHAT?!"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:16 EST