sb.o support in 2.4-broken?

From: Jim Bonnet (jimbo@sco.com)
Date: Wed Nov 08 2000 - 15:53:18 EST

Next message: Timur Tabi: "multiple definition of `__module_kernel_version'"
Previous message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Looking for better VM"
Next in thread: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?"
Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?"
Reply: Richard Torkar: "Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I am using the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. I have a sound blaster 16 which
works fine under 2.2.17.

I see that a while back someone posted on this problem previously but
there were no answers I can find..

Is support for soundblaster16 ISA broken in the 2.4 kernel? Compiled in
or used as a module I can not get it to work. I have passed sb=220,5,1,5
during boot when compiled in and also sent those during insmod.

When I boot to 2.2.17 these are the correct values and sound is happy :)

I am subbed to this group so you may answer here so this is on record.

Thanks much...

-- 
Jim Bonnet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Timur Tabi: "multiple definition of `__module_kernel_version'"
Previous message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Looking for better VM"
Next in thread: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?"
Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?"
Reply: Richard Torkar: "Re: sb.o support in 2.4-broken?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST