Re: for small packets TCP_NODELAY still delays

From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Tue Oct 31 2000 - 14:31:37 EST

Next message: Michael O'Donnell: "Re: eepro100: card reports no resources [was VM-global...]"
Previous message: Alex Deucher: "2.4test kernels, hpt366, sg devices"
In reply to: Antony Suter: "for small packets TCP_NODELAY still delays"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

> Does kernel 2.4.0-testX(latest) still have this behavior?

Why not to test and to report yet? 8)

It is not supposed to have this behaviour.

Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael O'Donnell: "Re: eepro100: card reports no resources [was VM-global...]"
Previous message: Alex Deucher: "2.4test kernels, hpt366, sg devices"
In reply to: Antony Suter: "for small packets TCP_NODELAY still delays"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:30 EST