On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> No argument here, but the overhead of reloading CR3 period will kill
> performance. [...]
2.4 does not reload CR3, unless you are using multiple user-space
processes.
> 2.4 does not beat NetWare, BTW, it gets a little further, but still
> hits the wall, [...]
as i told you in the previous mail, the main overhead is not CR3, it's the
copying & dirtying of all data, and the subsequent DMA-initiated dirty
cacheline writeback. I can serve 100 MB/sec web content with 2.4 & TUX
just fine - it relies on a zero-copying infrastructure.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:25 EST