Re: 2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!

From: Mohammad Haque (mhaque@haque.net)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2000 - 09:58:46 EST

Next message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [potential bug] generic_file_readahead()"
In reply to: Markus hennig: "2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Try 2.4.0-test10-pre5

Markus hennig wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> kernel 2.4.0test10-pre4
> pentium mmx with 64MB ram
> if anybody interested in more details i will send .config
>
> last log before freeze:
>
> Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!
> invalid operand: 0000
> CPU: 0

-- 
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque                              http://www.haque.net/ 
                                               mhaque@haque.net
  "Alcohol and calculus don't mix.             Project Lead
   Don't drink and derive." --Unknown          http://wm.themes.org/
                                               batmanppc@themes.org
=====================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kai Henningsen: "Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: [potential bug] generic_file_readahead()"
In reply to: Markus hennig: "2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:15 EST