Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010241559280.826-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
By author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Oh, I agree.
>
> And I think something like CLONE_EVENTS would be fine - and decide
> yourself what kind of threads you want (do you want indistinguishable
> "anonymous" threads like apache, or do you want a threads that handle
> separate event queues). Or you might have a mixture of the two - for web
> serving the "accept()" event list might be a separate thing with a few
> threads doing that, while "worker threads" handle the actual IO..
>
> But if you want to have some event queue ID, I just wonder how you'd set
> it up sanely without tons of complications..
>
How about handle the event queue ID as an event mask internally?
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:14 EST