Re: unfair stress on non memory allocating apps while swapout (in 2.4)

From: Bernd Eckenfels (ecki@lina.inka.de)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 17:37:12 EST

Next message: Evan Jeffrey: "Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?"
Previous message: Dan Maas: "Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <000b01c03bef$17e43c30$0200a8c0@W2K> you wrote:
> PS this is my first post to lkml so please keep that in mind...
> PPS ... so, was I right?

yes welcome, thanks for reminding me of that. And i think exactly that point
could be a bit optimized.

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Evan Jeffrey: "Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?"
Previous message: Dan Maas: "Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 21:00:14 EST