Re: [RFC] atomic pte updates and pae changes, take 2

From: David S. Miller (
Date: Sat Oct 14 2000 - 03:26:48 EST

   Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
   From: Linus Torvalds <>

   I dislike the "__HAVE_ARCH_xxx" approach, and considering that most
   architectures will probably want to do something specific anyway I
   wonder if we should get rid of that and just make architectures
   have their own code.

Most software-based TLB refill systems could (and sparc64 will) make
all ref/mod bit updates occur in the kernel software fault path so
that none of this special synchronization is necessary.

In such cases it might be nice to have a generic version that all such
ports can share by just not defining __HAVE_ARCH_xxx.

Sure it's a bit ugly, but it does allow code sharing, so it probably
at least deserves a chance :-)

David S. Miller
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST