Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 14:27:00 EST

Next message: David Ford: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Previous message: Michal Ostrowski: "pppoe and pppox circular dependencies in test9"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Next in thread: Dmitry Pogosyan: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > yes. Please remove the above part.
>
> OK, done.

thanks - i think all the other heuristics are 'fair': processes with more
CPU and run time used are likely to be more important, superuser processes
and direct-hw-access processes ditto.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Ford: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Previous message: Michal Ostrowski: "pppoe and pppox circular dependencies in test9"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Next in thread: Dmitry Pogosyan: "Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST