Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

From: Ingo Molnar (
Date: Mon Oct 09 2000 - 14:27:00 EST

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > yes. Please remove the above part.
> OK, done.

thanks - i think all the other heuristics are 'fair': processes with more
CPU and run time used are likely to be more important, superuser processes
and direct-hw-access processes ditto.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 15 2000 - 21:00:12 EST